Free · neutral · no sign-up
Pain and Suffering Calculator — estimate your non-economic damages
Estimate the non-economic part of an injury settlement — physical pain, emotional distress and loss of enjoyment. SettleWorth shows both accepted methods side by side: the multiplier and the per-diem.
Enter your medical bills, future medical costs, lost wages and property damage, choose the multiplier or per-diem method for pain and suffering, then set your state and your share of fault. The tool returns an estimated settlement range adjusted for your state's comparative-negligence rule.
What this estimates. Pain and suffering is the part of a settlement that does not come with a receipt. There are two accepted ways to value it — the multiplier (medical bills × 1.5–5) and the per-diem (a daily rate × recovery days). This tool runs whichever method you pick, so you can compare the two.
Both are accepted ways to put a dollar figure on non-economic damages — the multiplier method and the per diem method.
See also: Some claims are almost entirely non-economic. A dog attack that leaves permanent scarring is the clearest example, and the dog bite settlement calculator is built around that.
Real data
How pain and suffering is actually valued
Pain and suffering has no "average" — it is a component of a claim, not a case type, so there is no median to quote. What is well established is the method insurers and courts use: a multiplier applied to your medical bills, or a per-diem daily rate across your recovery. These are the real numbers that drive the result.
Method documented across personal-injury practice (multiplier 1.5–5 × medical bills; per-diem $100–$500/day), e.g. FindLaw — pain and suffering multiplier. These are calculation methods, not a settlement average — use the calculator above to run both on your own numbers.
The method
How the pain and suffering settlement calculator works
Two accepted methods; the calculator runs both. Documentation pushes the figure toward the higher end.
Multiplier method
Your medical bills × a number from 1.5 to 5, based on severity.
Per-diem method
A daily dollar amount (often your daily wage) × recovery days.
What raises it
Permanence, long recovery, impact on work and daily life, scarring.
What lowers it
Treatment gaps, pre-existing conditions, weak documentation.
Fault still applies
Your share of fault reduces non-economic damages too.
Worked example
How to calculate pain and suffering, step by step
Both accepted methods on the same claim, so you can see where they diverge and why the gap matters more than either figure on its own.
The claim. $14,000 in medical bills, $4,000 in lost pay, an injury that took five months to resolve with no permanent consequence, and no shared fault. Economic damages are $18,000. That part is arithmetic and nobody argues it.
Method one, the multiplier. Multiply the medical bills by a severity figure between 1.5 and 5. Five months of treatment with a full recovery is a middle case, so 3×: $14,000 × 3 = $42,000 non-economic, and $60,000 all in. Note what this method rewards — it scales off the bills, so an injury treated cheaply is valued lower than the same injury treated expensively.
Method two, the per-diem. Set a daily value and multiply by days of recovery. The usual anchor for the daily figure is a day of your own pay; at a $52,000 salary that is roughly $200 a day. Five months is about 150 days: $200 × 150 = $30,000 non-economic, and $48,000 all in.
What the $12,000 gap tells you. Neither number is the right one. The gap between them is roughly the room a negotiation has, and which method favours you is entirely structural: the per-diem favours long recoveries with small bills, and the multiplier favours expensive treatment over a short period. An adjuster will reach for whichever produces the lower figure on your facts, so it is worth knowing which one that is before the conversation rather than during it. The per-diem also has a hard limit — it is very difficult to argue past the point of full recovery, which is why permanent injuries are essentially always valued on the multiplier.
Then apply fault. Whichever method you used, your share of fault comes off the total at the end, not off the non-economic part alone. At 20% shared fault the multiplier result becomes $48,000 and the per-diem result $38,400.
Adjust for your state
Caps on pain and suffering by state
Pain and suffering is reduced by your share of fault, and the state rule decides by how much. Pure comparative trims it by your %; modified states bar recovery at 50–51%; contributory states can bar it entirely.
Recover even if mostly at fault; your award is cut by your %. e.g. California, Washington, New York.
No recovery if you are 50% or more at fault. e.g. Colorado, Georgia, Tennessee.
No recovery if you are 51% or more at fault. e.g. Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania.
Any fault at all can bar recovery. Only AL, MD, NC, VA & DC.
Where the ten largest states sit: California, New York and Washington apply pure comparative fault, so a share of blame cuts the total but never bars it. Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida — Florida since its 2023 reform — bar recovery at 51% or more. Georgia bars it at 50%. North Carolina and Virginia are contributory-negligence states where any share of fault at all can end the claim. Set your state in the calculator and it applies the right one for you.
Questions
Pain and suffering FAQ
With the multiplier method (medical bills × 1.5–5) or the per-diem method (daily rate × recovery days). This tool runs whichever you pick, so you can compare the two.
It varies — the multiplier usually wins for severe, long-lasting injuries; the per-diem can win for shorter recoveries on higher daily rates.
Non-economic damages tied to a physical injury are often non-taxable, but rules vary — confirm with a tax professional.
Yes, but insurers discount it heavily; a documented, well-argued figure (or an attorney) typically recovers more.
Medical records, a pain journal, photos, and testimony about how the injury changed your daily life.
Run both methods and look at the gap
The multiplier and the per-diem rarely land on the same figure. Run each on the same inputs: the distance between the two results is roughly the room a negotiation has, and it is more useful to you than either number on its own. No contact details are asked for at any point.
Open the calculator